By Richard Martin, Chief Strategist, Alcera Consulting Inc.
I’ve written and shared extensively in recent weeks how the global order is undergoing a profound realignment. The structural coherence that defined the postwar era of American high leadership—built on trade integration, institutional stability, and U.S.-led security alliances—has fragmented. The rise of strategic disruption, populist realignment, state-capitalist competition, and the breakdown of multilateral consensus has created a landscape marked by uncertainty, coercion, and asymmetry.
That story has been told. The volatility is no longer theoretical. It is operational. In the next few days, I will be sharing examples of how to analyze and build out defensive mitigation and offensive opportunity strategies.
The imperative now is not further diagnosis, but strategic navigation. Leaders, executives, and institutional decision-makers must act under conditions of system-level flux. The strategic question is no longer: Is the system breaking down? It is: What should I do about it?
This article presents a dual-mode approach to leadership in this environment:
- Defensive Mitigations to reduce exposure to systemic risk, disruption, and strategic shock.
- Offensive Strategies to exploit emerging asymmetries, access new arenas of opportunity, and assert strategic advantage in a realigned world.
Each of these defensive mitigation and offensive strategies must be fully analyzed with inferences incorporated into a detailed strategic plan with operational and tactical actions.
Defensive Mitigations: Preserving Institutional and Strategic Resilience
The purpose of defence is to buy time to reset and rearm for future action. The strategies I propose are not passive hedges; they are active investments in institutional survivability and continuity.
| Threat Vector | Risk Description | Defensive Mitigation |
| Geopolitical volatility | Realignment of alliances, trade pacts, and security guarantees | Scenario-based planning; geopolitical risk modeling; reshoring critical functions |
| Fragmented global trade | Supply chain disruption, tariffs, bilateral uncertainty | Supplier diversification, dual sourcing, national inventory buffers |
| Dollar system volatility | Currency risk, capital flow constraints, de-dollarization shifts | Currency hedging, regional settlement systems, balance sheet agility |
| Populist backlash against institutions | Reputational or operational attacks on elite or expert-led organizations | Local legitimacy-building, transparent governance, symbolic alignment with public interest |
| Regulatory nationalism | Data sovereignty, industrial policy, localization mandates | Legal agility, modular compliance frameworks, strategic lobbying |
Offensive Strategies: Identifying and Exploiting Asymmetries and Inflection Points
Volatility is not only threat—it is release. Leaders who recognize realignment as opportunity can seize asymmetric advantage.
| Strategic Domain | Emerging Opportunity | Offensive Play |
| Domestic manufacturing revival | State-led or populist incentives for industrial repatriation | Acquire distressed assets, align with national resilience funds, form public-private consortia |
| New geoeconomic zones | Bypass of traditional global centers (e.g. BRI corridors, regional blocs) | Engage secondary markets, build local partnerships, pioneer alternative supply routes |
| Strategic disengagements | U.S. withdrawal from global commitments creates power vacuums | Position as solution provider, security partner, or infrastructure builder in abandoned spaces |
| Decoupling from China | Institutional diversification away from the PRC across tech and trade | Lead in tech alternatives (e.g., semiconductors, rare earths); de-risked consumer markets |
| Cognitive legitimacy gaps | Collapse of institutional trust in media, government, and expertise | Become a trusted signaler: educational hubs, values-driven brands, institutional redesigns |
| Crisis-driven policy shifts | Infrastructure investment, energy transitions, reshoring mandates | Pre-position capabilities; convert regulatory compliance into first-mover advantage |
The Leader’s Posture: Agility with Intent
This is not a time for incrementalism. It is a time for bounded boldness: acting decisively within strategic foresight. Leaders must integrate both defensive posture and offensive positioning.
The new game is not played on stable terrain. It is navigated across tectonic shifts of power, risk, and opportunity. Those who thrive will be those who see the fractures not as fault lines, but as entry points.
Contact me to discuss how we can shape your future together.
About the Author
Richard Martin is the founder and president of Alcera Consulting Inc., a strategic advisory firm specializing in exploiting change (www.exploitingchange.com). Richard’s mission is to empower top-level leaders to exercise strategic foresight, navigate uncertainty, drive transformative change, and build individual and organizational resilience, ensuring market dominance and excellence in public governance. He is the author of Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. He is also the developer of Worldview Warfare and Strategic Epistemology, a groundbreaking methodology that focuses on understanding beliefs, values, and strategy in a world of conflict, competition, and cooperation.
© 2025 Richard Martin
Discover more from Exploiting Change
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
