By Richard Martin, Chief Strategist, Alcera Consulting Inc.
Executive Summary: Five Principles of Strategic Thinking
- Understand Before You Judge
Apply the principle of charity: reconstruct the internal logic of others before evaluating their objectives and strategies.
- Recognize Inherited Structures
Institutions are not always designed; they often emerge from rational actors muddling through.
- Respect Deep Beliefs
People act from deeply held convictions—even when they can’t fully articulate them.
- Describe Before You Prescribe
Good strategy starts with descriptive clarity, not moral or ideological judgment.
- Embrace Complexity
Strategy demands comfort with ambiguity, conflicting truths, and evolving structures.
Introduction: Understanding Before Action
In an era marked by rapid change, polarization, and systemic stress, clear strategic thinking is more essential—and more elusive—than ever. To act effectively, one must first understand. But understanding is not agreement, and clarity does not require moral alignment.
This methodology of strategic thinking is grounded in epistemic realism, historical humility, and the principle of charity. It seeks to describe the world not as we wish it to be, but as it is—structured by beliefs, institutions, and strategic choices that, however flawed, are often rational from within.
1. Understand Before You Judge
Strategic thinking begins with interpretation. The principle of charity asks us to reconstruct the strongest, most coherent version of another’s position before responding to it. This means entering the worldview of others, on their terms—even if we ultimately disagree.
This is also essence of Strategic Epistemology:
Understand the world as others see it.
See through the actor’s frame: what they value, how they perceive threats and opportunities, and what they believe is real. Strategic Epistemology provides a progression of understanding.
This sequence allows us to trace how deep frameworks of meaning shape surface-level behaviour. Without this lens, we risk caricature, wishful thinking, or projection.
2. Recognize Inherited Structures
Every system we inhabit—legal, monetary, political—is the product of historical decisions, often made under duress or uncertainty. Most were not designed from scratch. They were built incrementally by actors doing their best to manage trade-offs with the information they had.
A strategic mindset avoids assuming malice or incompetence when inertia or constraint will do. This is not naïveté; it is realism. Strategic structures often persist because they work well enough—not because they were perfectly designed.
This principle also applies to current incumbents: even flawed leaders are often muddling through, rather than executing sinister masterplans.
3. Respect the Depth of Belief
Human behaviour is not exclusively rational—it is also structured by moral conviction, metaphysical frameworks, and identity commitments. These beliefs may be unconscious, inarticulate, or resistant to debate, but they matter profoundly.
Strategists must learn to map these unspoken commitments, not dismiss them as irrational. What appears to be “bad policy” may be the logical expression of sacred values under constraint.
To ignore this is not just arrogant—it’s strategically blind.
4. Describe Before You Prescribe
The most common failure in strategic discourse is to leap to judgment before laying the groundwork for understanding. Before we decide what should be done, we must clarify what is happening, why it’s happening, and how actors are positioned within it.
This requires:
- Identifying key actors and interests
- Reconstructing their internal logic
- Mapping power structures, leverage points, and constraints
- Recognizing the symbolic, moral, and psychological dimensions of their behaviour
Only after this can strategic recommendations be grounded, not reactive.
5. Embrace Complexity
Real-world decision-making occurs under conditions of:
- Incomplete information
- Conflicting incentives
- Cultural and epistemic fragmentation
- Constant evolution
There is rarely a single “correct” move. Strategic clarity lies not in simplifying the world, but in seeing its structure clearly through complexity.
This requires intellectual maturity: a willingness to hold multiple truths in tension, navigate ambiguity, and update models as the situation evolves.
Conclusion: Toward Strategic Maturity
Strategic thinking is not about clever tactics. It is a discipline of seeing:
- With empathy, not sentimentality
- With realism, not cynicism
- With structure, not dogma
By applying the principle of charity, respecting historical inheritance, and mapping the symbolic and epistemic frameworks of others, we can engage the world as it is—not just as we imagine it to be.
This is the foundation of Strategic Epistemology. It is the path to deeper understanding, better decisions, and more resilient action in a world of accelerating complexity.
About the Author
Richard Martin is the founder and president of Alcera Consulting Inc., a strategic advisory firm specializing in exploiting change (www.exploitingchange.com). Richard’s mission is to empower top-level leaders to exercise strategic foresight, navigate uncertainty, drive transformative change, and build individual and organizational resilience, ensuring market dominance and excellence in public governance. He is the author of Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. He is also the developer of Worldview Warfare and Strategic Epistemology, a groundbreaking methodology that focuses on understanding beliefs, values, and strategy in a world of conflict, competition, and cooperation.
© 2025 Richard Martin
Discover more from Exploiting Change
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
